Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive357% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory42.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 01:34
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 68.2
1-Core 162
2-Core 321
96% 184 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,058
101% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,524
94% 1,524 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
156% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 226
Parallax 234
174% 224 fps
MRender 262
Gravity 210
Splatting 143
161% 205 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 156%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1677 2045 2107 2171 2130 2137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
357% Outstanding
Read 2510
Write 328
Mixed 561
SusWrite 2,044
300% 1,361 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 76
269% 98.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 882
DQ Mixed 1,072
806% 1,087 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 357%
Great: 393%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
107GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 409 419 333 370 407 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 390
Write 249
Mixed 218
SusWrite 394
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 37.8
127% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 99%
WD VelociRaptor 2.5" 1TB-$51
678GB free
Firmware: YB01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 182 182 183 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 182
Mixed 115
SusWrite 182
128% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.5
288% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 114%
Great: 120%
WD WD3000BLFS-08YBU0 300GB
5GB free
Firmware: 04.04V06
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 95.2
Write 91
Mixed 66.2
63% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.3% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.8
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 27.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,040 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,008
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback