Lenovo 4236TE2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 4236TE2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4236TE2
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180604
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 16 '20 at 15:40
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 139
63% 102 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 200
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.65
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.57 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.52
3% 3.06 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LF1i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 232 217 238 239 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 346
Write 257
Mixed 276
SusWrite 220
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 21.5
82% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 27.5
90% 197 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 95%
Ricoh SD Disk Device 63GB
57GB free
Firmware: 01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 45 41 33 45 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 4% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3020EC58E9F1333 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback