| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus K52JU (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK K52JU |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110125 |
| Uptime | 0.9 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 16 '20 at 10:45 |
| Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
| Run User | CHE-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 M 480
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
|
42%
Average
|
47% 75.2 Pts
|
19% 147 Pts
|
10% 153 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6300M
Asus(1043 1C92) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
|
1.34%
Terrible
|
1% 1.91 fps
|
1% 1.75 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
15GB free
Firmware: UE50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 72 9.4 72 76 80 MB/s
|
27.6%
Poor
|
29% 129 MB/s
|
38% 13 MB/s
|
39% 70 MB/s
|
|
Fujitsu MJA2500BH G2 500GB
222GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8919
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 6.4 25 26 14 10 MB/s
|
20.7%
Poor
|
27% 36 MB/s
|
97% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
2TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 16 21 22 22 21 MB/s
|
14.9%
Very poor
|
28% 21 MB/s
|
106% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CH9 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
23.5%
Poor
|
24% 8.27 GB/s
|
15% 5.4 GB/s
|
31% 128 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical K52JU Builds (Compare 50 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus K52JU
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 15x |
| Core i3 M 350Intel $199Bench 38%, 14,351 samples | 6x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 5x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6300MAMDBench 1%, 2,918 samples | 43x |
| Radeon HD 6370MAMDBench 1%, 535 samples | 6x |
| Radeon HD 6300M Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.20)AMDBench 1%, 20 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $158 |