Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200811
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '20 at 13:32
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$81 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	93.5% Outstanding	Memory 79.9 1-Core 148 2-Core 295 94% 174 Pts	4-Core 575 8-Core 852 89% 713 Pts	64-Core 1,072 66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 93.5% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Gigabyte(1458 37CB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 123 Parallax 126 105% 126 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 123 Splatting 100 106% 134 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 1TB SSD 12,276 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 890GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS303226 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1972 998 997 988 1004 997 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 1,412 Write 2,683 Mixed 1,642 SusWrite 1,159 391% 1,724 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 197 4K Mixed 83.5 283% 109 MB/s	DQ Read 1,184 DQ Write 1,186 DQ Mixed 1265 929% 1,212 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 286%
Toshiba HG5d Q Series 128GB 2,624 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 47GB free Firmware: HTRAN101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 161 161 105 122 139 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 490 Write 192 Mixed 418 SusWrite 143 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 85.9 4K Mixed 42.4 138% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 138 113% 164 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C18 1x16GB 2,305 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.6% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 21 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 22.4 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4S Builds (Compare 355 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 126%

UFO

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 119%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4S

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $81Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	80x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $190Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	67x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	34x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	32x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	22x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	18x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	18x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	12x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	10x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 101%, 32,191 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 89%, 87,344 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $740

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16