Asus P5E-VM DO/NA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5E-VM DO/NA  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 7 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 23:45
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
49.9% Average
Memory 73.9
1-Core 38.3
2-Core 76.8
42% 63 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 151
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.100.0.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.54% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 14.5
5% 9.74 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 17.4
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SV1604E 160GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VW100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 40 19 41 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Read 29.8
Write 34.9
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 34.2
22% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
20.9% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback