Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 14:35
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 106
2-Core 196
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 512
50% 407 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.2
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 19.2
12% 21.6 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 19.4
14% 16.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 272 55 51 52 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,361
Write 901
Mixed 859
SusWrite 89.5
178% 803 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 66.8
231% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 464
DQ Mixed 84.2
151% 293 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 149%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK Kingston 99U5711-002.A00G 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.7% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 21.8
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 99.1
40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback