Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DD
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 14:22
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 68.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 165
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 365
39% 312 Pts
64-Core 379
23% 379 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 58%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.10.30.02
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
7.98% Terrible
Lighting 8.47
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 9.84
7% 9.95 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 15.7
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.98%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 231 88 56 56 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,271
Write 903
Mixed 792
SusWrite 100
170% 767 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 64.8
223% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 630
DQ Mixed 221
240% 389 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 147%
Great: 209%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB
448GB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 33.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 33.6
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.5
184% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK Kingston 99U5711-002.A00G 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.8% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 22.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 20.9
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DD_FX505DD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback