HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G1 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140417
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AND-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3220-$36
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 176
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 181
23% 176 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Gigabyte(1458 3503) 1GB
CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Lighting 11.3
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 9.47
9% 11.4 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 12.7
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 127 119 135 127 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 296
Write 214
Mixed 234
SusWrite 123
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 29.1
116% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 180
135% 178 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 124 123 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 124
Write 61.2
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 122
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-017.A00LF Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $141
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback