Acer ConceptD CN515-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer ConceptD CN515-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL GrolschC_KLS
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 05:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8305G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 204
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 501
55% 435 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1376) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.47% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 41
Parallax 7.81
5% 18.5 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 14
9% 10.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
771GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1764 1615 1629 1642 1645 1646 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,032
Write 1,942
Mixed 1,739
SusWrite 1,657
415% 1,843 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 59.7
203% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,037
DQ Write 869
DQ Mixed 934
705% 946 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 288%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.9% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21
73% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 17.7
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ConceptD CN515-51 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer ConceptD CN515-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback