Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '20 at 03:48
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Memory 89.4
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 97.1
52% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 247
26% 206 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6950
AMD(1002 0B00) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
21.4% Poor
Lighting 27.5
Reflection 21.5
Parallax 23.9
22% 24.3 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 21.8
Splatting 27.7
20% 23.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 103 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 304
Write 206
Mixed 282
SusWrite 102
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 37
120% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 35.3
DQ Write 65
DQ Mixed 43.4
35% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 124%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 600GB
298GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 209 208 207 208 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 189
Mixed 99.4
SusWrite 205
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.7
318% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 110%
Great: 132%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
103GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 48 49 48 49 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 46.9
Write 41.8
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 47.9
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 59%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
162GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 103 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 79
SusWrite 102
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback