Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N450 2,527 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	Memory 31.1 1-Core 6.8 2-Core 10.5 13% 16.1 Pts	4-Core 10.2 8-Core 9 1% 9.6 Pts	64-Core 8.9 1% 8.9 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 36%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 128GB 3,901 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT08D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 100 98 101 97 102 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.1% Poor	Read 202 Write 104 Mixed 110 SusWrite 100 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 9.3 34% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 33.3 DQ Write 27.1 DQ Mixed 29.1 22% 29.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4542453231554538414653422D38472D4620 1x2GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	6.51% Terrible	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.07 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 0.7 4% 1.37 GB/s	Latency 248 16% 248 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.51% Great: 10%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16