Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '20 at 13:04
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 58%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 166
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 672
65% 536 Pts
64-Core 867
54% 867 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
PNY(196E 133C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 113
Parallax 102
94% 110 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 110
Splatting 100
100% 127 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 779 302 309 309 312 316 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
ASMT 2115 500GB
133GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 195 194 196 112 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 216
Mixed 207
SusWrite 155
273% 206 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 8.3
861% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 37.1
DQ Mixed 18.1
1,950% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 121%
Great: 166%
Seagate Slim BK 500GB
416GB free, PID a014
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 110 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
43% Average
Read 109
Write 102
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 109
127% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43%
Great: 42%
General UDisk 8GB
6GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.7 2.7 3.4 3.2 3.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.2
6% 5.45 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
15% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FD F4-2400C15-8GVR BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FD F4-2400C15-8GVR 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 28.2
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 26.8
79% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback