Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x7-Z8750 376 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Memory 42.2 1-Core 25.6 2-Core 51.1 26% 39.6 Pts	4-Core 63.4 8-Core 52.1 8% 57.8 Pts	64-Core 77.9 5% 77.9 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2.97 2% 2.76 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.7 2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba 064G70 63GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 138 Write 76 Mixed 100 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 24.3 4K Mixed 8.44 52% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 26.6 DQ Write 35.6 DQ Mixed 8.26 13% 23.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 28%
Generic SD SD Card 63GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 5GB free Firmware: 0.2 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 40.6 Write 9.41 Mixed 20.3 18% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.43 318% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 25%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 766 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 49GB free, PID a83a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 110 142% 111 MB/s	4K Read 4.99 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.98 92% 2.39 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 2x2GB 7,517 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.7% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 10 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 66%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16