HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory4.5 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 13 '20 at 10:26
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5640
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 108
53% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 453
40% 340 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
62.1% Good
Lighting 82.5
Reflection 74.7
Parallax 78.6
67% 78.6 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 55.7
52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EF0300FARMU 300GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 53 49 37 53 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 130
Write 59.1
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 47.9
56% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M392B5670EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M392B5670EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M392B5670EH1-CH9 ID:01 98 9965426-021.A00LF ID:01 98 9965426-024.A00LF ID:01 98 9965426-021.A00LF 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 20
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 19.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback