Lenovo 81F5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81F5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181128
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateOct 13 '20 at 03:19
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 86.2
59% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 261
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Lighting 6.57
Reflection 9.85
Parallax 6.81
5% 7.74 fps
MRender 8.48
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 14
8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
565GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1253 1181 1209 1247 1244 1238 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,302
Write 1,204
Mixed 962
SusWrite 1,229
264% 1,174 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 67.5
236% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 676
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 273
304% 516 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 228%
Great: 295%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
600GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 101 116 114 108 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 59.3
Write 61.9
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 110
51% 69.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
84% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 859B CT8G4SFD824A.M16FE1 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 21
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 24.6
SC Mixed 21.9
58% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81F5 Builds (Compare 1,178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback