Asus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '20 at 20:30
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$224
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 300
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 920
92% 747 Pts
64-Core 1,658
103% 1,658 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
PNY(196E 1337) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 157
Reflection 146
Parallax 150
128% 151 fps
Gravity 132
Splatting 107
104% 120 fps
Poor: 105% Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 106 112 119 109 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 890
Write 190
Mixed 207
SusWrite 112
76% 350 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 33.9
132% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 147
119% 172 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 169%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 958GB
743GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 233 238 240 240 240 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 192
Write 21.5
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 232
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 11
53% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 12.2
DQ Mixed 14.5
12% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 104%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 956GB
890GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 233 238 240 240 240 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 412
Write 435
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 232
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 8.1
54% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 47.8
DQ Write 13.2
DQ Mixed 2.8
9% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 105%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 64GB-$48
54GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 36.2
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 39.4
50% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
96% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GISB Corsair CMV8GX4M1A2400C16 F4-3000C16-8GISB 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 23.6
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 20.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z490-F GAMING - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback