Gigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime8 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 18:03
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10600K-$125
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 128
2-Core 255
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 783
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 982
61% 982 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Lighting 97.5
Reflection 87.3
Parallax 83
79% 89.3 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 82.1
Splatting 76.7
74% 93.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 236 97 97 109 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 394
Write 113
Mixed 347
SusWrite 172
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 30.4
117% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 168
158% 243 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW8GX4M1E3200C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z490 AORUS ELITE AC Builds (Compare 3,612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z490 AORUS ELITE AC - $241

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback