Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-V (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141027
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '20 at 14:11
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89 20,692 User benchmarks, average bench 73% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 201 77% 132 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 484 54% 423 Pts	64-Core 488 30% 488 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.65 Parallax 1.16 2% 2.05 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 1.87 2% 2.22 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 332GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 446 451 456 430 421 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 450 Mixed 364 SusWrite 446 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 77.2 4K Mixed 42.1 141% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 358 268% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 137 140 141 141 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Read 143 Write 145 Mixed 93.8 SusWrite 139 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 96%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 16GB-$19 1,806 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 4GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 96.8 Write 27.1 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 20 36% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.5 83% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB 7,477 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.1 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	229x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	89x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	54x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	32x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GBBench 71%, 36,832 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	26x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $566

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16