Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory42.1 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 10:55
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 178
65% 115 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 382
37% 305 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 70.6
Parallax 86.7
56% 75.3 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 57.8
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 607 430 435 434 423 324 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 822
Write 937
Mixed 969
SusWrite 442
179% 793 MB/s
4K Read 50.8
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 71
209% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 713
DQ Write 655
DQ Mixed 674
508% 681 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 157%
Great: 302%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
466GB free
Firmware: AM0G3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 114
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 112 111 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 110
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 111
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.5
156% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 57%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 64GB
1GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 11 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 11.7
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 10.5
19% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 KHX2666C16/16G CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.3% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 24.3
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 19.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 7,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback