Huanan Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics87.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHuanan Default string  (all builds)
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-TF
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateOct 11 '20 at 10:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 188
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 670
60% 509 Pts
64-Core 1,364
84% 1,364 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
87.7% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 99.8
Parallax 103
91% 105 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 94.7
Splatting 79.8
81% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0425B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 232 231 110 235 231 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Read 1,584
Write 1,274
Mixed 974
SusWrite 219
225% 1,013 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 21.7
135% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 351
294% 436 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 137%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HNMI8GD4240D0 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90% Outstanding
MC Read 38
MC Write 37.4
MC Mixed 29.3
100% 34.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Default string Builds (Compare 947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Huanan Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback