Biostar A960D+V3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A960D+V3  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180110
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 20:56
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4130 Quad-Core-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 69.8
1-Core 28
2-Core 42.4
34% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 44
8-Core 27.4
5% 35.7 Pts
64-Core 19.7
1% 19.7 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 4.81
4% 4.44 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.22
4% 5.28 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 34 15 54 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 71
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 35
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB DDR3 1333 1.5V 4GB DDR3 1333 1.5V 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 11.4
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 8.1
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+V3 Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback