Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '20 at 09:55
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 136
2-Core 266
91% 164 Pts
4-Core 488
8-Core 784
78% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 147
Parallax 127
111% 137 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 136
Splatting 111
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 250GB 250GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0727A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 165 162 168 161 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 459
Mixed 446
SusWrite 195
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 56.2
188% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 132
160% 281 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 107%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
118GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 316 316 317 317 316 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 473
Mixed 456
SusWrite 337
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 60.6
205% 73.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 121%
Great: 129%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
1TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 135 138 131 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 132
Write 128
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 135
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
244% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.7
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 19.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING Builds (Compare 4,180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $975
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback