Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 14 '17 at 03:35
Run Duration500 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 264
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 694
77% 606 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 94%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 378.78
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 67.3
Parallax 58.5
57% 65.1 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 65.5
55% 67.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.7% Above average
Read 251
Write 177
Mixed 176
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 16.8
92% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 48.6
64% 117 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 137
Write 141
Mixed 131
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.42
4K Mixed 0.23
102% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 101%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 157
Write 143
Mixed 140
110% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.27
99% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 164
Write 141
Mixed 140
112% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.19
61% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 113%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
845GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 160
Write 126
Mixed 114
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.23
100% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
286GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 127
Write 146
Mixed 112
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 5.38
4K Mixed 0.62
201% 2.26 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 112%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
35GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 76.3
Write 64
Mixed 63.7
51% 68 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.15
4K Mixed 0.38
88% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 58%
Seagate External 2TB
24GB free, PID 3332
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 62.9
Write 68.1
Mixed 49.8
77% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.16
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 64%
SMI USB disk 8GB
2GB free, PID null
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 3.66
Mixed 4.31
7% 7.15 MB/s
4K Read 3.33
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.002
12% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5403-160.A00LF 99U5403-160.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 20
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $438
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback