Hp-pavilion NC683AA-ABA m9500y

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion NC683AA-ABA m9500y  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI Aspen
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081029
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '17 at 03:02
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9750
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
48.6% Average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 70.4
41% 60.2 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 134
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
EVGA(3842 1431) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.38
4% 4.2 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2CW12 119GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.7% Below average
Read 194
Write 99
Mixed 112
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 12.9
77% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 85.6
DQ Mixed 11.4
22% 41.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 47%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
496GB free
Firmware: CC24
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 139
Write 148
Mixed 136
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.2
69% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
24.3% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 9.2
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NC683AA-ABA m9500y Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion NC683AA-ABA m9500y

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback