Arcelik PCGBLOPT58G-MKUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemArcelik PCGBLOPT58G-MKUK  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110413
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 18:42
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 84.7
46% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 167
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.87% Terrible
Lighting 2.23
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 2.07
Splatting 2.39
2% 2.42 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.87%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Turbox 128GB 128GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 73 46 47 46 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 392
Write 318
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 92.7
47% 213 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 5.4
49% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 31.7
DQ Mixed 1
8% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 84%
Samsung HD161GJ 160GB-$25
149GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 115 116 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 114
Write 52.1
Mixed 58.9
SusWrite 116
63% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PCGBLOPT58G-MKUK Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Arcelik PCGBLOPT58G-MKUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback