MSI A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A12-9800 R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 59.9
2-Core 138
52% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 238
32% 237 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
MSI(1462 7A36) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Lighting 7.8
Reflection 8.81
Parallax 14.2
6% 10.3 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 13.8
Splatting 6.91
7% 8.25 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 2.3 24 39 72 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 372
Write 249
Mixed 246
SusWrite 59.4
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 26.5
4K Mixed 13.7
45% 16.3 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 63
DQ Mixed 41.5
42% 69.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
267GB free
Firmware: GG2OACA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 95 103 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 96.7
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 98.5
60% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AID48G30C18KSM-XMP 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.3% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 590 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-VD/S (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback