Lenovo 20ASS1WJ00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20ASS1WJ00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20ASS1WJ00
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180530
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 09 '20 at 01:34
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 144
63% 104 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 161
27% 190 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Legend(17AA 501F) 1GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
3.48% Terrible
Lighting 3.63
Reflection 6.31
Parallax 5.87
3% 5.27 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.61
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.48%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SPCCSolidStateDisk 256GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 55 107 39 91 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 991647 (996647) 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback