Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111202
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 21:47
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 78.4
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 101
49% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 197
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Lighting 49
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 41.1
40% 45.6 fps
MRender 39.9
Gravity 42.5
Splatting 38
33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mknssdcl 120GB-DX 120GB
21GB free
Firmware: 502A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 120 132 130 131 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 214
Write 136
Mixed 165
SusWrite 124
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 30.7
107% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 144
112% 155 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
234GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 15 14 15 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 107
Write 12
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 13.6
29% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 112%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
125GB free
Firmware: ZM10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 61.5
Mixed 38.9
SusWrite 59.2
40% 54.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
68GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 74 73 74 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 86.7
Write 84.9
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 73
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32.9% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.9
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback