Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 21:38
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 173
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 562
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 575
36% 575 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 635
Nvidia(10DE 1032) 1GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
6.22% Terrible
Lighting 7.9
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 8.97
6% 8.32 fps
MRender 5.29
Gravity 7.93
Splatting 7.65
6% 6.96 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.22%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 47 42 42 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 393
Write 62.4
Mixed 108
SusWrite 47.6
33% 153 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.1
32% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 91%
Crucial_CT240M500SSD1 250GB
141GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 142 138 136 142 143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 476
Write 138
Mixed 201
SusWrite 138
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 12.9
68% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 20.2
58% 135 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
584GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 45 45 44 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 173
Write 4.3
Mixed 9
SusWrite 42.4
41% 57.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
63% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 107C 4TB
564GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 98 98 99 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 136
Write 101
Mixed 70
SusWrite 97.4
130% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 60%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
4TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 140 135 131 138 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 148
Write 158
Mixed 102
SusWrite 137
184% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
210% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. M378B5173DB0-CK0 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.8% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 16.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 14.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback