Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime23.8 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 13:06
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 152
2-Core 300
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 585
8-Core 874
91% 730 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.3% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 107
Parallax 110
88% 108 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 94
Splatting 80.6
81% 102 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280P4 240GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP123PH0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 215 161 222 222 192 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,343
Write 445
Mixed 244
SusWrite 216
122% 562 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 48
188% 73 MB/s
DQ Read 715
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 251
295% 514 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 153%
Great: 197%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
481GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 103 112 115 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 78.5
Write 112
Mixed 66
SusWrite 110
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.15278S.004 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 24.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback