Acer Aspire XC-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-605
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 12 '17 at 17:53
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 365
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Sapphire(174B 0620) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.57
Reflection 3.12
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.55 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.43
2% 2.66 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 139
Write 135
Mixed 111
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.37
111% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG Kingston ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-605 Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback