Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S1  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 04:39
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 162
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 328
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
EVGA(3842 1312) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.31 fps
MRender 2.62
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.72 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 74 18 92 13 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 140
Write 83.5
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 60.5
20% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 20.3
54% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 57.1
DQ Mixed 25.3
24% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 85%
pqi IntelligentStick 4GB
3GB free, PID 0059
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Read 10.8
Write 2
Mixed 3.8
SusWrite 2.7
5% 4.83 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Q1030108 053E TR1020014 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 15.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H61M-S1 Builds (Compare 2,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S1 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback