HP 870-287nc

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 870-287nc  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 830C
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 05 '20 at 23:59
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Memory 84.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 277
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 759
80% 643 Pts
64-Core 760
47% 760 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
HP(103C 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.2% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 121
Parallax 97.8
93% 111 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 103
Splatting 105
99% 124 fps
Poor: 92%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-256G-1006 500GB
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 421 304 432 346 412 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 488
Write 455
Mixed 372
SusWrite 382
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 37.9
126% 42.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 288
234% 331 MB/s
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
576GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 125 126 124 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 133
Write 99.3
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 124
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74%
Great: 109%
WD My Passport 2599 4TB
52GB free, PID 2599
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 72 55 55 70 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 104
Write 95.2
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 58.8
103% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.1
40% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 45%
Sony QD-G120F 109GB
84GB free, PID 0c55
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 324
Write 162
Mixed 204
268% 230 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 9.3
618% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 22.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 29.6
SC Mixed 22.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 73.3
54% 73.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-287nc Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

System: HP 870-287nc

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $443
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback