Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2370M-$272 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Memory 84.2 1-Core 63.3 2-Core 107 54% 84.7 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 160 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 163 10% 163 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Acer(1025 054F) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 1.44 2% 2.74 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 3.91 2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 420 422 400 397 396 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 448 Write 382 Mixed 350 SusWrite 407 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 19.3 75% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 41.4 82% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 433GB free Firmware: AX0E1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 110 109 111 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 83.7 Write 74.9 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 110 54% 75 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KSN-4G Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16.4 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	21x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	18x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	11x

RAM
ACR256X64D3S13C9G 2x2GBKingstonBench 38%, 1,037 samples	4x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	3x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	3x

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $240