Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '17 at 06:55
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
63% Good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 112
55% 86.2 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 211
32% 232 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 35.1
Parallax 32.5
33% 35.9 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 34.5
29% 35.1 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 375
Write 148
Mixed 212
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 40.9
4K Mixed 11.5
67% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 11.3
15% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 88%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 219
Mixed 152
132% 177 MB/s
4K Read 4.59
4K Write 2.98
4K Mixed 0.38
289% 2.65 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P55A-UD4P Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD4P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $751
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback