Acer Aspire V3-471G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-471G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA40_HC
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 05 '20 at 09:37
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 174
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 432
49% 382 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0678) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.54% Terrible
Lighting 3.93
Reflection 22.2
Parallax 2.69
3% 9.59 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 7.48
4% 4.81 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.54%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 45 41 37 28 8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 428
Write 54.2
Mixed 85
SusWrite 31.2
32% 150 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 15.7
53% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 59.3
DQ Mixed 39
42% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 53%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
1TB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 101 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
49% Average
Read 87.3
Write 114
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 103
122% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.2
162% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 49%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73BH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-471G Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-471G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback