Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Gigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '20 at 15:12
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 193 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 556 56% 455 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	89% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 106 Parallax 115 93% 111 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 94.6 Splatting 83.4 82% 103 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 412 410 415 415 411 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 2,384 Write 2,200 Mixed 1,324 SusWrite 427 353% 1,584 MB/s	4K Read 56.7 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 72.9 238% 79.9 MB/s	DQ Read 666 DQ Write 466 DQ Mixed 568 424% 567 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 197 186 200 195 194 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 144 Write 184 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 193 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 99% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 22.6 72% 25.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 21.4 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	741x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	167x
Core i5-9600KIntel $137Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	166x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	187x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	165x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	127x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	43x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	201x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	63x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $476

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16