Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '20 at 13:28
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5700 APU (2012 D.Tr)-$265
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 57.8
2-Core 106
51% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 160
22% 161 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
5.91% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 8.35
Parallax 7.09
6% 7.64 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 8.52
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.91%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 102 136 147 147 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 164
Write 150
Mixed 87
SusWrite 127
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB
120GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 1.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 1.7
2% 1.7 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ- EWB4GB681PAE- 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 9.5
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A55M-DS2 Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-DS2 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $353
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback