HP 500-017es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 500-017es  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130205
Uptime15.6 Days
Run DateOct 03 '20 at 10:21
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 78.4
2-Core 161
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 277
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 36E5) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.15
Parallax 8.09
6% 7.35 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 7.13
Splatting 0.13
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
786GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 83 56 84 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 125
Write 146
Mixed 27
SusWrite 74.2
67% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback