| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
| Motherboard | EVGA 132-CK-NF79 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20091230 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 03 '20 at 04:29 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
57.3%
Above average
|
51% 83.4 Pts
|
31% 228 Pts
|
15% 239 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
EVGA(3842 1461) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
15% 18.4 fps
|
18% 21.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 416 414 421 421 421 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
97% 429 MB/s
|
143% 47.7 MB/s
|
199% 303 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
23.2%
Poor
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
20% 7.13 GB/s
|
44% 89.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 132-CK-NF79 Builds (Compare 44 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA 132-CK-NF79
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Extreme X9770IntelBench 57%, 522 samples | 13x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 7x |
| Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 4x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $228 |