Intel X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardIntel X58  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32.0039 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 13:54
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5660
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 142
60% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 439
44% 360 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Lighting 50
Reflection 48.3
Parallax 63.1
41% 53.8 fps
MRender 53.2
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 38.3
38% 47.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 40%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,387
Write 2,999
Mixed 3,020
699% 3,136 MB/s
4K Read 242
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 151
635% 178 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 488
376% 514 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 126%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
28GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 156 150 151 156 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 156
Write 145
Mixed 145
SusWrite 154
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 30.3
97% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 225
154% 188 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 223%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
93GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 103 100 101 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 54
SusWrite 101
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
28GB free
Firmware: 0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 25.9
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 16.8
19% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 66%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
3GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.2 4.2 4 3.9 4.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
4.51% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 4
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4
9% 8.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.51%
Great: 22%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 12 12 10 10 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Read 23.7
Write 9.6
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 10.9
19% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.7
40% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0-YF8 Hynix HMT42GR7BMR4C-G7 Winbond W25X/Q32 68GB
1066, 1066, 33 MHz
16384, 16384, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback