QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory31.2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.2GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory27.2 GB free of 31.25 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '20 at 08:43
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
49.6% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 44.8
2-Core 91.3
42% 67.1 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 396
34% 290 Pts
64-Core 1513
94% 1513 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 67%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 215GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 22 24 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.4% Below average
Read 115
Write 17.7
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 21.2
34% 46 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
300% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15616 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 68.8
MC Write 63.8
MC Mixed 64.6
188% 65.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 155%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback