Asus X441NA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X441NA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X441NA
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 14:38
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 47.5
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 97.6
38% 65.1 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 193
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505
Asus(1043 1640) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 2.22
1% 2.19 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYLN256HCHP-000L2 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT63L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 279 260 238 187 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 385
Write 298
Mixed 231
SusWrite 234
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 13.7
48% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 232
184% 257 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 104%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 116 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65% Good
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 115
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 65%
Great: 67%
USB3.0 External Device 500GB
466GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 39 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 35.8
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 37.3
45% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 170
24% 170 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X441NA Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X441NA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback