Asus PRIME B450M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-K  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '20 at 12:57
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 70
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 397
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 4.53
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 77.5
4% 36 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 1.09
24% 33.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jamesdonkey JD120 120GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JD2020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 403 407 295 133 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 465
Write 406
Mixed 393
SusWrite 281
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 10.5
80% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 161
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 39.7
90% 181 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 92%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
429GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 91 92 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 88.5
Mixed 71
SusWrite 88.9
63% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB4GU2400.C8FT Corsair CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 20.3
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450M-K Builds (Compare 3,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback