Dell PowerEdge T310

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell PowerEdge T310
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T310  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101015
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateSep 29 '20 at 17:50
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3430
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 121
56% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 235
32% 235 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell VIRTUAL DISK 249GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1028
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 75 72 71 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 84.2
Write 98.2
Mixed 49
SusWrite 73.5
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 84%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB
29GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 7.5 4.3 4.4 4.9 8.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Read 25.5
Write 3.8
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.6
9% 9.35 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.3
62% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M391B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 6 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PowerEdge T310 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback