PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME B250M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20161108 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Apr 09 '17 at 14:27 |
Run Duration | 213 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
PwrHis(1787 5000) 3GB
CLim: 960 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.3.3
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
598GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
54.7%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD740ADFD-00NLR1 74GB
69GB free
Firmware: 21.07QR5 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
|
40.7%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit 124GB
104GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
52.4%
Above average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FBD2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
47.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 615x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 517x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 345x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 436x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 299x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 168x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $254 |