Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '17 at 12:13
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 160
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 354
40% 312 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Zotac(19DA 3265) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.5% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 24.8
Parallax 29.3
20% 26.3 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 26.7
24% 30 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GOODRAM 240GB
191GB free
Firmware: SBFM10.8 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 515
Write 456
Mixed 388
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 9.95
107% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 14.2
62% 140 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 102%
OCZ Vector 150 120GB-$89
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 520
Write 417
Mixed 457
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 19.5
96% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 68.6
101% 188 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 100%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$49
213GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 167
Mixed 147
121% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.34
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.29
135% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 18.5
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $216
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback