Asrock H97 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97 Performance  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 17:20
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 94.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 210
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 385
52% 390 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8428) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Lighting 9.93
Reflection 9.38
Parallax 11.7
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 13.1
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 436 450 441 456 455 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 449
Mixed 434
SusWrite 443
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 91.4
4K Mixed 51.5
171% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 276
231% 335 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 159GB
118GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 65.7
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 66.8
45% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.5% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 20.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 20.2
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Performance Builds (Compare 505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Performance - $171

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $819
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback