Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270P-D3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171108
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 14:44
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 220
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 700
64% 537 Pts
64-Core 702
44% 702 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 28.6
30% 30 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 33.4
28% 35 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$71
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 382 389 392 383 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 398
Write 396
Mixed 334
SusWrite 373
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 38.8
148% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 199
174% 253 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 127%
Seagate IronWolf 1TB (2016)-$57
910GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 175 175 176 175 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 169
Mixed 79.4
SusWrite 173
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.M8FD 859B CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH3 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.4
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 22.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 2,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback