Acer Predator G3-605

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G3-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3-605
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140103
Uptime44.1 Days
Run DateSep 28 '20 at 11:54
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 175
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 296
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 93.6
Reflection 82.5
Parallax 86.8
76% 87.6 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 85.5
Splatting 66.1
76% 97 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 94 34 131 71 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.1% Below average
Read 155
Write 96.5
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 106
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 16.3
4K Mixed 9.3
39% 12.7 MB/s
DQ Read 15.2
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 210
144% 169 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
520GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 145 147 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 155
Write 122
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 145
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
740GB free, PID 0202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 92 93 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 78.7
Write 89.7
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 92.1
98% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML16GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.8% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 7.6
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-605 Builds (Compare 1,551 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback